
01
The record
Each candidate is written down with a clear way it could fail.
An invention-development service. Not a law firm.
The mechanism
The parts are visible, and the gears keep turning. A written record should be this clear.

01
Each candidate is written down with a clear way it could fail.

02
Pass and fail are written down before any result comes in.

03
Organised for your registered patent attorney, and marked as needing their check.
On the bench
We do not replace them. We put the notebook, the sample, the page and the measurement in an order your attorney can use.

What was tried, who was there, and the date.

A sample, a number, and a pass and a fail written first.

The thing itself, not only a description of it.

A clean page for the record. What it is, and what it is not.

What your attorney receives, marked for their check.

Signed before any technical detail is said.

Research groups and tech-transfer offices with more findings than they have time to document.
Learn more
Listed companies whose public statements about their IP have to stand up to scrutiny.
Learn more
Founders and developers of any kind of IP who are raising money and get asked: what do you own?
Learn more
An example
Illustration. Not a client. Not a filing. Not a grant.
The technical story is invented for this page, so you can see what a record looks like without seeing anyone’s work. Every real record carries the same five labels. Each one says what it is, and what it is not.
The test, written before any result
Pass — the cap opens at the set pressure, and the contents stay in.
Fail — it opens too early, too late, or the contents leave.
Established
On this team's bottles, the seal fails before the bottle wall does.
Their own notes. Not our measurement.
Modelled
A line scored into the liner could open at a chosen pressure.
A calculation. It has not been built.
In development
The depth of that line, so it opens in range and does not leak early, is not yet made.
Written down so it can be built, or dropped.
In validation
Nothing. No measurement has been run.
The test below is written first.
Filed
Nothing. This page has not been filed.
An illustration is not an application.

The first meeting
The agreement, first. A mutual confidentiality agreement is signed before anything technical is said.
What you bring. The problem, and the people who know it. Not a formed invention.
What you leave with. You see what a written record looks like, and whether there is a candidate worth testing.
What you do not leave with. The system. You receive its outputs. The system stays ours, which is also how every client’s confidence is kept.
Who the inventor is. The person on your side who made the inventive contribution. We record who contributed what, so your attorney can assess it.
The person
The first conversation is with the principal, not with a desk that has no one behind it.
The register below is our own filed work. Those filings have led to research collaborations with several universities and the scientists in those groups. That is not a list of clients, it is not a grant of any application, and it is not a promise about yours.
The register
Every family on the 23 October export, each title counted once. The titles only — not the method, and not a promise that any of it works. Select a point.
Register · 23 families
Body · 1 on the export
Tag-free fibroblast growth factors, with vascular use named in the filing alongside neurologic, dermatologic, and metabolic use. AU 2026901586, filed 27 February 2026. Not a medicine, and not a grant.
23 families, 142 titles, each counted once. 136 marked filed · 6 provisionals converted to PCT · 1 Australian complete in train. Export 23 October 2026.
Related lines
Every engagement delivers outputs you keep:
Invention records — each candidate with a named mechanism, a worked example with quantified parameters, and a stated way it could be shown wrong.
A dated technical landscape — what the public literature and patent documents show around your problem, as technical research.
An attorney-ready disclosure pack — facts, embodiments and alternatives, structured for your registered patent attorney and stamped “verification required”.
A test plan — the cheapest decisive measurement for each candidate, with pass and fail written before any result.
Evidence labels on every statement — Established · Filed · Modelled · In validation · In development, each with its basis.
We say this on page one because you’d find it anyway:
Nothing technical is shared before a mutual confidentiality agreement is signed.